It has recently come to The Paper’s attention that a dispute has arisen between Fitzpatrick Pharmacy and the owner of the building in which the pharmacy is located. The dispute, which centers on a large rent increase (over 100%) for the pharmacy, has flared to the point that eviction procedures have been begun by the landlord, Mr. Fred Radke. Mr. William Fitzpatrick, owner of the pharmacy, offered to pay a rent increase of just over 20%, but his offer was refused, and he has been ordered to vacate the premises by December 31.
Although we realize that it is not the function of The Paper to interfere between tenant and landlord, we do feel that it would be detrimental to the neighborhood at large to lose its only drug store. We have chosen to speak on the issue because of the neighborhood’s stake in the outcome of the dispute. In addition to its value as a source of medicine, sundry items and services, the very existence of Fitzpatrick Pharmacy testifies to the stability and prosperity of the surrounding neighborhood. We feel that its eviction would constitute a loss of prestige as well as a vital service.
The relationship between a business — of whatever type — and its surrounding neighborhood is more important than many realize. The condition of one influences the other. Mr. Fitzpatrick has demonstrated many times that he understands this.
We urge both parties in this dispute to be conscious of the impact of their actions on the neighborhood and to negotiate their differences in the direction of a more positive goal than the demise of Fitzpatrick Pharmacy.
Originally published in The Paper, December 1975.
Read this article in the original newspaper issue.
Original source: SD_Times1975_12.pdf, printed page(s) 2; PDF page(s) 2.
